4.3 Review

Thiazolidinediones and the liver in humans

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN LIPIDOLOGY
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages 477-483

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MOL.0b013e3283321d37

Keywords

adiponectin; glucose; insulin; nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; nonalcoholic steatohepatitis; very low-density lipoprotein

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review To review recent advances in the understanding of the mechanism of action of thiazolidinediones (TZDs) in humans. Recent findings The liver is characterized by excess fat accumulation due to nonalcoholic causes (non-alcoholic fatty liver disease) in most patients with the metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes. Simple steatosis can progress to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and cirrhosis. Both of the commercially available anti hyperglycemic TZD agonists, pioglitazone and rosiglitazone, are markedly effective in reducing liver fat content by 30-50% and sensitizing the liver to insulin. This reduces the amount of endogenous and exogenous insulin needed to inhibit hepatic glucose production. Decreases in liver fat are closely correlated with increases in serum adiponectin, which is an insulin-sensitizing adipokine produced exclusively by adipose tissue. Both TZDs are equally effective in reducing liver fat. Regarding lipid metabolism, enhanced hepatic insulin sensitivity would be predicted to lower VLDL and serum triglycerides and increase HDL-cholesterol. Pioglitazone and rosiglitazone have different effects on serum lipids, which cannot be attributed to simple insulin sensitization. Very recently, TZDs have been shown to reduce not only steatosis but possibly also hepatocellular damage in NASH. Summary Given the uncertainties in benefits of TZDs in reducing cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes, as well as other sideeffects (heart failure, fractures), TZDs may in the future be increasingly used in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available