4.3 Review

Epidemiology and control of Clostridium difficile infections in healthcare settings: an update

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages 370-376

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/QCO.0b013e32834748e5

Keywords

027/BI/NAP1 strain; Clostridium difficile; epidemiology; infection control

Funding

  1. Agence Nationale de la Recherche
  2. Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique [PHRC AOR06006]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review The epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infections (CDIs) has dramatically changed over the last decade in both North America and Europe. The objectives of this review are to highlight the recent epidemiological data and to provide an overview of the current knowledge of infection control measures. Recent findings Since 2003, many countries have reported increased incidence of CDI and outbreaks of severe cases of CDI. This trend is assumed to be due, in part, to the emergence and rapid spread of a 'hypervirulent' strain, known as 027/BI/NAP1. This strain has become endemic in many hospitals in North America and Europe. CDI rates have also increased in the community and new genotypes (e. g. PCR ribotype 078) are emerging in both humans and animals. To prevent cross-contamination and to reduce the incidence of CDI, infection control guidelines, based primarily on experience of hospitals during outbreaks, have been recently updated in Europe and the United States. CDI prevention relies on a bundle of measures including antimicrobial stewardship, prompt diagnosis, and the implementation of contact precautions. Currently, most of these measures have appeared effective in controlling outbreaks, but the best methods to reduce CDI incidence in settings of endemicity are still unknown. Summary The recent changes in CDI epidemiology have pushed infection control healthcare workers and scientific societies to revisit and update their guidelines for infection control.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available