4.2 Review

The evolving molecular genetic landscape in acute myeloid leukaemia

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN HEMATOLOGY
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages 79-85

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MOH.0b013e32835d821c

Keywords

acute myeloid leukaemia; biomarkers; genomics

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review Acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) is a heterogeneous disease with a variable response to therapy. The heterogeneity of AML is evident from variations in morphology, immunophenotype, cytogenetics and molecular abnormalities. The introduction of genome-wide technologies has enabled an even more detailed molecular analysis of AML. As a result, the molecular landscape of AML is rapidly evolving. The purpose of this review is to discuss the recent advances made in this field, with a special focus on risk stratification of AML. Recent findings Clinical AML has been analysed in great molecular detail by gene expression profiling and more recently through epigenetic profiling and next generation sequencing. This has resulted in the identification of novel biomarkers, some of which appear to have a consistent clinical impact in AML, that is mutations in the genes encoding DNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 3 alpha (DNMT3A), additional sex combs-like 1 (ASXL1), tet methylcytosine dioxygenase 2 (TET2) and Runt-related transcription factor 1 (RUNX1). In addition, massively parallel sequencing has revealed a great mutational heterogeneity as well as temporal clonal evolution in AML. Summary The list of acquired mutations with clinical value in AML is growing. Clinical implementation of this multitude of markers will require integrated approaches and selection of markers to facilitate AML risk stratification in the future. The revealed molecular heterogeneity and evolution in AML will have implications for developing targeted therapies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available