4.2 Article

Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand and the regulation of hematopoiesis

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN HEMATOLOGY
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages 42-48

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MOH.0b013e3282f15fa6

Keywords

hematological malignancies; hematopoiesis; TRAIL; TRAIL receptors

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review This review will focus on the emerging role of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL)/TRAIL-receptors in the pathophysiology of hematopoiesis and on the potential therapeutic applications of either recombinant TRAIL or anti-TRAIL-R1/-R2 agonistic antibodies for the treatment of hematological malignancies. Recent findings While CD34(+) stem/progenitor cells do not express TRAIL-receptors and are protected from TRAIL-induced apoptosis, accumulating evidence points to a role for elevated expression/release of TRAIL at the bone marrow level in the pathophysiology of aplastic anemia, Fanconi anemia, and myelodysplastic syndromes. In-vitro data show promising synergistic effects of recombinant TRAIL in association with proteasome or histone deacetylase inhibitors, natural compounds or small molecules in the therapy of myeloid and lymphoid malignancies. Moreover, although both recombinant TRAIL and anti-TRAIL-R1/-R2 antibodies are well tolerated in vivo, anti-TRAL-R1/-R2 agonistic antibodies show the potential advantage of avoiding the neutralizing activity of the soluble receptor osteoprotegerin. Summary While a chronic pathological elevation of TRAIL at the bone marrow level might contribute to the impairment of normal hematopoiesis, the use of recombinant TRAIL and anti-TRAIL-R1/-R2 agonistic antibodies appears particularly promising for the treatment of hematological malignancies in particular, of multiple myeloma, especially if used in association with innovative therapeutic compounds.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available