4.1 Review

Guilt by association: intestinal metaplasia does not progress to gastric cancer

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 34, Issue 6, Pages 458-464

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MOG.0000000000000472

Keywords

autoimmune gastritis; gastric cancer; Helicobacter pylori; intestinal metaplasia; pseudopyloric metaplasia; risk assessment; spasmolytic polypeptide-expressing metaplasia; stem cells; transdifferentiation

Funding

  1. Research Service Department of Veterans Affairs
  2. Public Health Service [DK56338]
  3. [F30 DK107173]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review This review integrates the new thinking about relationships between gastric cancer and intestinal metaplasia/pseudopyloric metaplasia (SPEM). We address whether recent studies have closed or widened the knowledge gap regarding gastric cancer pathogenesis in mice or humans. Recent findings Recent studies in mouse models have provided a variety of new insights into the cellular origin and progression of events resulting in gastric cancer. Many suggest a direct transformation from intestinal metaplasia/pseudopyloric metaplasia/SPEM to gastric cancer. However, results from different investigator and models are conflicting and often describe events not present in studies in humans. Summary Both Helicobacter pylori-associated and autoimmune gastritis may produce gastric atrophy with extensive intestinal metaplasia and an abnormal gastric microbiome. However, only H. pylori gastritis carries a risk for adenocarcinoma. The differences reported with mouse models can best be explained as the results of different models of regeneration and repair rather than as models of gastric cancer. Overall, the data remains consistent with the original hypothesis that gastric cancer results from increased genetic instability of gastric stem cells rather than a direct transition from metaplasia to cancer. Intestinal metaplasia, pseudopyloric metaplasia, and SPEM have all been falsely accused based on guilt by association.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available