4.1 Review

New insights into the pathogenesis of pancreatitis

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 29, Issue 5, Pages 523-530

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MOG.0b013e328363e399

Keywords

acute pancreatitis; chronic pancreatitis; nuclear factor kappa B; trypsin

Funding

  1. NIH [R01 DK093047, R01 DK058694, R01 DK092145]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of reviewIn this article, we review important advances in our understanding of the mechanisms of pancreatitis. Recent findingsThe relative contributions of intrapancreatic trypsinogen activation and nuclear factor kappa B (NFB) activation, the two major early independent cellular events in pancreatitis, have been investigated using novel genetic models. Trypsinogen activation has traditionally held the spotlight for many decades as the central pathogenic event of pancreatitis. However, recent experimental evidence points to the role of trypsin activation in early acinar cell damage but not in the inflammatory response of acute pancreatitis, which was shown to be induced by NFB activation. Further, chronic pancreatitis developed independently of trypsinogen activation in the caerulein model. Sustained NFB activation, but not persistent intra-acinar expression of active trypsin, was shown to result in chronic pancreatitis. Calcineurin-NFAT (nuclear factor of activated T-cells) signaling was shown to mediate downstream effects of pathologic rise in intracellular calcium. Interleukin-6 was identified as a key cytokine mediating pancreatitis-associated lung injury. SummaryRecent advances challenge the long-believed trypsin-centered understanding of pancreatitis. It is becoming increasingly clear that activation of intense inflammatory signaling mechanisms in acinar cells is crucial to the pathogenesis of pancreatitis, which may explain the strong systemic inflammatory response in pancreatitis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available