4.1 Review

Proton pump inhibitors: potential adverse effects

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages 615-620

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MOG.0b013e328358d5b9

Keywords

B12 deficiency; bone fractures; Clostridium difficile; hypomagnesemia; pneumonia; proton pump inhibitor side effects

Funding

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs [08-028]
  2. Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Office of Research and Development
  3. Houston VA HSR&D Center of Excellence [HFP90-020]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review This review summarizes adverse effects of potential proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), including nutritional deficiencies (B12 and magnesium), rebound acid hypersecretion, acute interstitial nephritis, gastric carcinoid tumor, cardiovascular risk with clopidogrel and PPI coprescription, bone fractures, enteric infections and pneumonia. An epidemiologic framework is applied to assess clinical relevance and reinforce best practice recommendations. Recent findings The evidence for PPI adverse events is limited by the absence of Level 1 (randomized controlled trial) studies. The best evidence supports Clostridium difficile and bone fractures in susceptible populations. A substantial reduction in gastrointestinal bleeding risk without increase in cardiovascular events was observed in the COGENT trial when clopidogrel was coprescribed with omeprazole. The risk of pneumonia is inconsistent, and although acute interstitial nephritis, nutritional deficiencies (including B12 and hypomagnesemia), gastric carcinoid and rebound hyperacidity are biologically plausible, studies have failed to demonstrate supportive clinical relevance. Summary Prescribe PPI for robust indications only. Strong data supporting risk of adverse events are lacking; however, exercise caution in the elderly and in patients with other risk factors for bone fractures or C. difficile infection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available