4.1 Article

The role of the macrophage in sentinel responses in intestinal immunity

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 26, Issue 6, Pages 578-582

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MOG.0b013e32833d4b71

Keywords

inflammatory bowel disease; innate immunity; macrophage

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [RO1 DK54452, T32 DK007737, F32 DK083186]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review The purpose of this review is to highlight macrophages as central mediators of intestinal immune homeostasis and inflammation. Recent findings We review recent developments elucidating distinct phenotypic adaptations in intestinal macrophages that determine their functional role in a microbe-rich environment. The involvement of intestinal macrophages in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease is also discussed. Summary Intestinal macrophages represent the largest pool of tissue macrophages in the human body and a critical interface with the enteric microbiota. In normal physiology, luminal microbes breach the intestinal epithelial barrier and gain access to the lamina propria. Bacteria are efficiently phagocytosed by macrophages strategically located underneath the epithelium. The importance of functional adaptations of macrophages to perform their role in this unique environment is best illustrated by failure of these mechanisms during the development of chronic inflammatory bowel diseases. Compared with monocytes or macrophages from any other organ, intestinal macrophages express different phenotypic markers, efficiently eradicate intracellular bacteria, but do not mount potent inflammatory responses. Converging human genetic and functional findings suggest that dysregulation of macrophage-specific immune responses against an otherwise harmless enteric microbiota are key factors in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available