4.1 Article

Recent insights into the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages 47-52

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MOG.0b013e328332b850

Keywords

colorectal cancer; epimutation; genome-wide association studies; microRNA

Funding

  1. NIH [CA72851, CA129286]
  2. Baylor Research Institute
  3. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA129286, R01CA098572, R01CA072851] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths in the but our understanding of this disease is incomplete. The recent advent Western world, of new technologies has provided novel insights into the pathogenesis of CRC. Recent findings Genome-wide association studies have recently linked CRC to 10 common genetic variants or single-nucleotide polymorphisms that map to chromosomes 8q23, 8q24, 10p14, 11q23, 14q22, 15q13, 16q22, 18q21, 19q13 and 20p1. However, the causal significance of these variants is not understood, and some are located in poorly characterized genomic regions or gene deserts. Recent studies indicate that the single-nucleotide polymorphism rs6983267, which maps to 8q24, serves as an enhancer of MYC expression by binding T cell factor 4 (TCF4) and influencing Writ signaling. In addition, several microRNAs interact with genes such as K-RAS, APC, p53, PTEN, TCF4, COX-2, DNMT3a and DNMT3b. Germline hypermethylation of the DNA mismatch repair genes MLH1 and MSH2 may serve as predisposing events in some CRC patients. Summary Recent studies have elucidated novel mechanisms involved in CRC, including the involvement of single-nucleotide polymorphisms not located within traditional genes, the role of microRNAs and epimutations in DNA mismatch repair genes. Interestingly, most of this progress has been made by understanding DNA that does not encode genes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available