4.1 Article

Pathogenesis and treatment of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli infections

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages 38-47

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MOG.0b013e3282f2dfb8

Keywords

Escherichia coli O157 : H7; enterohemorrhagic E. coli; E. coli; hemolytic uremic syndrome; Shiga toxin; Shiga toxin-producing E. coli

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli cause hemorrhagic colitis and hemolytic uremic syndrome. We will summarize the literature on incidence and outcomes of these infections, and then review the pathogenesis to explain the current recommendations against antibiotic use and to suggest alternative therapies. Recent findings Shiga toxin-producing E coli continue to be prevalent in the industrialized world because of dissemination in food products contaminated by ruminant feces. Declines in ground beef-related outbreaks have been matched by increased cases related to green vegetables. Fifteen percent of patients infected with E coli O157:H7 progress to hemolytic uremic syndrome, but this figure may reach 50% if antibiotics are used. Mechanisms for bacteriophage induction causing Shiga toxin production, and for Shiga toxin dissemination to endothelium in gut, kidney and brain, may explain the negative effects of antibiotics and lead to rational therapies. Shiga toxin binders were not effective in clinical trials, but more avid binding agents may be. Current treatment recommendations are to maintain hydration to prevent thrombotic complications. Human vaccines are unlikely to be utilized. Cattle vaccines may prove the most significant approach to this disease. Summary Improved understanding of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli pathophysiology and progression to hemolytic uremic syndrome provides the basis for prevention, prophylactic and treatment strategies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available