4.1 Review

Vitamin D status in gastrointestinal and liver disease

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages 176-183

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MOG.0b013e3282f4d2f3

Keywords

celiac disease; cystic fibrosis; gastrointestinal disease; inflammatory bowel disease; liver disease; vitamin D

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [M01 RR002172] Funding Source: Medline
  2. PHS HHS [M01 002172] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [M01RR002172] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review The purpose of this review is to report on the vitamin D status and its relationship with bone health in individuals with gastrointestinal and liver disorders. In addition, recommendations regarding replacement and maintenance of optimal vitamin D stores, as well as the state of knowledge regarding its effect on the disease through its actions on the immune system will be reviewed. Recent findings The scientific community has revised upward the serum levels of vitamin D considered optimal, and doses of vitamin D much larger than those currently recommended may be needed to maintain these levels, especially in individuals with gastrointestinal and liver disorders. The relationship between vitamin D and bone health in this population is controversial. The role of vitamin D in the regulation of the immune system continues to be elucidated. Summary Hypovitaminosis D is prevalent among individuals with gastrointestinal and liver disease. Although replacement and supplementation guidelines have not been well defined, practitioners should aim for a serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level of at least 32 ng/ml. The contribution of vitamin D to the bone health of these individuals and its role in altering disease course through its actions on the immune system remain to be elucidated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available