4.3 Review

Enhanced recovery pathways as a way to reduce surgical morbidity

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN CRITICAL CARE
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages 385-392

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e3283558968

Keywords

enhanced recovery; fast track; multimodal care; perioperative care; surgery

Funding

  1. University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust - University of Southampton Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit
  2. United Kingdom Department of Health's National Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Unit funding scheme
  3. University College London Hospital-University College London Biomedical Research Centre

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review The aim of this review is to summarize important publications in enhanced recovery during 2010-2011 and to highlight key themes. Specifically, we focus on updated systematic reviews of high-quality clinical trials of enhanced recovery in colorectal surgery, exemplar studies of enhanced recovery in other specialties, and exploration of which elements of the enhanced recovery package might be associated with improved patient outcome. Recent findings An expanding evidence base of clinical trials and implementation evaluations supports the effectiveness of enhanced recovery programmes in improving outcome following major elective surgery. The majority of this literature derives from the study of patients undergoing colorectal surgery, but increasingly enhanced recovery is spreading to other surgical specialties. The combination of reduced length of hospital stay (a surrogate for morbidity) with no increase in readmissions to hospital suggests that morbidity is reduced with enhanced recovery. Inconsistency in morbidity reporting limits the value of pooling data between studies, but within study comparisons in general support this conclusion. Patients adhering to an enhanced recovery programme return to normal function faster than those following traditional care pathways. Summary Enhanced recovery adoption is likely to continue to grow (range of specialties and penetration within specialties). This progression is supported by the available published data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available