4.3 Review

Monitoring of endothelial dysfunction in critically ill patients: the role of endothelial progenitor cells

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN CRITICAL CARE
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages 354-360

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e3282fc216d

Keywords

angiogenesis; endothelial progenitor cells; endothelium; sepsis; vasculogenesis

Funding

  1. NCATS NIH HHS [UL1 TR000454] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCRR NIH HHS [UL1 RR025008, UL1 RR025008-01] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review This review provides an overview of sepsis as a prototypical critical illness and discusses the role of the endothelium in the pathophysiology of sepsis and sepsis-related organ dysfunction, the characterization and functions of endothelial progenitor cells, and investigates these cells both as a prognostic and therapeutic strategy in critically ill patients. Recent findings Sepsis continues to be a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Preclinical and clinical sepsis studies have shown that the acute systemic inflammatory and procoagulant response results in structural and functional alterations in the endothelium, which may lead to organ failure and ultimately, death. In the last decade, the concept of postnatal vasculogenesis has been revolutionized to include angiogenesis by mature endothelial cells and vasculogenesis by endothelial progenitor cells. These cells are recruited from the bone marrow to areas of endothelial injury, at which point they differentiate and promote revascularization of the endothelium, which has been shown to have significant prognostic and therapeutic implications in a variety of ischemic vascular disorders. Summary Circulating endothelial progenitor cells may be an important mechanism of vascular repair, and thus shows significant promise for prognostic and therapeutic strategies in critical illness, namely sepsis and sepsis-related organ dysfunction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available