4.2 Article

The dermcidin gene in cancer: role in cachexia, carcinogenesis and tumour cell survival

Journal

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MCO.0b013e3282fb7b8d

Keywords

cancer cachexia; cancer cell proliferation and survival factors; dermcidin; proteolysis-inducing factor; Y-P30

Funding

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council Funding Source: Medline
  2. Cancer Research UK Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review The diverse protein products of the dermcidin gene are relevant to immunity, cancer cell progression and cancer cachexia. This article evaluates recent developments/ controversies around dermcidin. Recent findings Dermcidin has recently been shown to act as a survival/proliferation factor in hepatoma and prostate cancer cell lines. Recent studies suggest that the Y-P30 subunit of the dermcidin polypeptide offers a survival advantage in such cancer cells. Nevertheless, the relevance of Y-P30 to cancer growth in vivo, and mechanisms of action remain unknown. In mice, tumour cells appear to glycosylate the Y-P30 subunit, transforming it into a potent skeletal muscle proteolysis-inducing factor. Recent work has described a receptor and signal transduction pathways for murine glycosylated proteolysis-inducing factor. The absence of classical N-glycosylation sites in the human proteolysis-inducing factor peptide and the lack of specific tools for the detection of the key carbohydrate moieties conferring the proteolysis-inducing activity, however, remain barriers to confirming glycosylated proteolysis-inducing factor as a pro-cachectic factor in humans. Summary There is a growing body of evidence illustrating dermcidin as an oncogene and Y-P30 as a survival factor. The biology of murine proteolysis-inducing factor as a pro-cachectic factor continues to evolve; however, its role in human biology remains speculative.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available