4.1 Review

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and vascular risk

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN CARDIOLOGY
Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages 420-428

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/HCO.0b013e328354829c

Keywords

cardiovascular disease; ectopic fat; insulin resistance; nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; risk factor

Funding

  1. Southampton NIHR (National Institute of Health Research) Biomedical Research Unit in Nutrition, Lifestyle and Obesity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is an increasingly common condition, which is strongly associated with obesity and diabetes. The risk of cardiovascular disease is increased in NAFLD and represents the main cause of death in these patients. However, given the shared features between NAFLD, the metabolic syndrome and traditional cardiovascular risk factors, uncertainty exists as to whether NAFLD is an independent risk factor for increased cardiovascular disease. Recent findings Multiple epidemiological and case-control studies now demonstrate that NAFLD is associated with increased vascular risk, independently of conventional cardiometabolic risk factors. Evidence also suggests a graded association between NAFLD severity and increased vascular risk. However, given the heterogeneous disease spectrum of NAFLD, these findings have limitations with respect to accuracy of diagnosis and staging of NAFLD in most studies. Summary Although accumulating evidence points to NAFLD emerging as a novel cardiovascular risk factor, more research is needed to find suitable noninvasive biomarkers of NAFLD severity to allow better risk-stratification based on cardiovascular outcomes. Furthermore, with no established pharmacological treatment option for NAFLD currently available, any potential treatment must show efficacy not only in slowing liver disease progression, but also in ameliorating adverse cardiovascular outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available