4.7 Review

Bioremediation of uranium-contaminated groundwater: a systems approach to subsurface biogeochemistry

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages 489-497

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.copbio.2012.10.008

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Integrated Field Research Challenge Site at Rifle, Colorado
  2. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory's Sustainable Systems Scientific Focus Area
  3. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research (BER) [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  4. DOE work package [10094]
  5. DOE [DE-SC0004114, DE-SC0004080, DE-SC0006790]
  6. Royal Society
  7. U.K. Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)
  8. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0004114, DE-SC0006790] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
  9. NERC [NE/H007768/1, NE/D005361/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/D005361/1, NE/H007768/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Adding organic electron donors to stimulate microbial reduction of highly soluble U(VI) to less soluble U(IV) is a promising strategy for immobilizing uranium in contaminated subsurface environments. Studies suggest that diagnosing the in situ physiological status of the subsurface community during uranium bioremediation with environmental transcriptomic and proteomic techniques can identify factors potentially limiting U(VI) reduction activity. Models which couple genome-scale in silico representations of the metabolism of key microbial populations with geochemical and hydrological models may be able to predict the outcome of bioremediation strategies and aid in the development of new approaches. Concerns remain about the long-term stability of sequestered U(IV) minerals and the release of co-contaminants associated with Fe(III) oxides, which might be overcome through targeted delivery of electrons to select microorganisms using in situ electrodes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available