4.1 Review

Prophylaxis and treatment of the side-effects of neuraxial morphine analgesia following cesarean delivery

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN ANESTHESIOLOGY
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages 288-295

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e328360b086

Keywords

cesarean delivery; epidural morphine; nausea; pruritus; spinal morphine; vomiting

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review Neuraxial morphine is commonly used for analgesia after cesarean delivery, but is frequently associated with postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and pruritus. This review describes the recent advances in the management of those side-effects. Recent findings Neuraxial-morphine-induced side-effects are dose related; therefore, the minimum effective dose should be used. Dexamethasone, 5HT(3) receptor antagonists, antihistamines, and anticholinergics reduce the incidence of PONV, whereas metoclopramide 10 mg does not appear to be effective for PONV prophylaxis in this patient population. Combination antiemetic therapy provides improved prophylaxis compared with monotherapy, but has seldom been studied in women undergoing cesarean delivery with neuraxial morphine. Studies of P6 acupressure reported inconsistent results. Polymorphism of the m-opioid receptor may affect the severity of neuraxial-morphine-induced pruritus. Opioid antagonists and mixed agonist/antagonists appear to be the most useful for the management of opioid-induced pruritus. Prophylactic 5HT(3) receptor antagonists and dexamethasone do not seem to be effective for reducing the incidence of pruritus. In contrast, ondansetron, pentazocine, and dimenhydrinate may be useful for treating established pruritus. Summary PONV and pruritus are frequent side-effects of neuraxial morphine. Future studies investigating combination antiemetic therapy, long-acting antiemetics, and strategies to manage pruritus are needed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available