4.1 Review

Induced changes in protein receptors conferring resistance to anesthetics

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN ANESTHESIOLOGY
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages 405-410

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e328354fda8

Keywords

anesthetic mechanism; anesthetic resistance; Caenorhabditis elegans; gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor; ligand-gated ion channel; mutation; tandem pore potassium channel

Categories

Funding

  1. Stanford University Department of Anesthesia
  2. United States Department of Veterans Affairs
  3. United States National Institutes of Health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review Although general anesthetics have been provided effectively for many years, their exact molecular underpinnings remain relatively unknown. In this article, we discuss the recent findings associated with resistance to anesthetic effects as a way of shedding light on these mechanisms. Recent findings The original theories of anesthetic action based upon their effects on cellular membranes have given way to specific theories concerning direct effects on ion channel proteins. These molecular targets are intimately involved in the conduct of neuronal signaling within the central nervous system and are thought to be essential in the modulation of conscious states. It is the lack of a thorough understanding of unperturbed consciousness that fosters great difficulty in understanding how anesthetics alter this conscious state. However, one very fruitful line of analysis in the quest for such answers lies in the examination of both in-vitro and in-vivo ion channel systems that seem to maintain variable levels of resistance to anesthetics. Summary Information about the possible targets and molecular nature of anesthetic action is being derived from studies of anesthetic resistance in g aminobutyric acid receptors, tandem pore potassium channels, and an apparently wide variety of protein systems within the nematode, Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available