4.4 Article

Inhibitory input to the direction-selective ganglion cell is saturated at low contrast

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 114, Issue 2, Pages 927-941

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00413.2015

Keywords

neural computation; retinal circuitry; ideal observer; noise immunity; Schmitt trigger

Funding

  1. National Eye Institute [EY-022070, EY-016607]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Direction-selective ganglion cells (DSGCs) respond selectively to motion toward a preferred direction, but much less to motion toward the opposite null direction. Directional signals in the DSGC depend on GABAergic inhibition and are observed over a wide range of speeds, which precludes motion detection based on a fixed temporal correlation. A voltage-clamp analysis, using narrow bar stimuli similar in width to the receptive field center, demonstrated that inhibition to DSGCs saturates rapidly above a threshold contrast. However, for wide bar stimuli that activate both the center and surround, inhibition depends more linearly on contrast. Excitation for both wide and narrow bars was also more linear. We propose that positive feedback, likely within the starburst amacrine cell or its network, produces steep saturation of inhibition at relatively low contrast. This mechanism renders GABA release essentially contrast and speed invariant, which enhances directional signals for small objects and thereby increases the signal-to-noise ratio for direction-selective signals in the spike train over a wide range of stimulus conditions. The steep saturation of inhibition confers to a neuron immunity to noise in its spike train, because when inhibition is strong no spikes are initiated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available