4.4 Article

Neural circuit basis of visuo-spatial working memory precision: a computational and behavioral study

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 114, Issue 3, Pages 1806-1818

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00362.2015

Keywords

short-term memory; working memory; precision; capacity; attractor model

Funding

  1. Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness of Spain
  2. European Regional Development Fund [BFU2009-09537, BFU2012-34838]
  3. Karolinska Institutet Strategic Neuroscience Program
  4. Generalitat de Catalunya (Beatriu de Pinos program) [2007BP-B100135]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The amount of information that can be retained in working memory (WM) is limited. Limitations of WM capacity have been the subject of intense research, especially in trying to specify algorithmic models for WM. Comparatively, neural circuit perspectives have barely been used to test WM limitations in behavioral experiments. Here we used a neuronal microcircuit model for visuo-spatial WM (vsWM) to investigate memory of several items. The model assumes that there is a topographic organization of the circuit responsible for spatial memory retention. This assumption leads to specific predictions, which we tested in behavioral experiments. According to the model, nearby locations should be recalled with a bias, as if the two memory traces showed attraction or repulsion during the delay period depending on distance. Another prediction is that the previously reported loss of memory precision for an increasing number of memory items (memory load) should vanish when the distances between items are controlled for. Both predictions were confirmed experimentally. Taken together, our findings provide support for a topographic neural circuit organization of vsWM, they suggest that interference between similar memories underlies some WM limitations, and they put forward a circuit-based explanation that reconciles previous conflicting results on the dependence of WM precision with load.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available