4.6 Article

NMDA Receptors in Glial Cells: Pending Questions

Journal

CURRENT NEUROPHARMACOLOGY
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages 250-262

Publisher

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/1570159X11311030002

Keywords

Astrocytes; ischemia; NG2 glia; NMDA receptors; oligodendrocyte progenitors; oligodendrocytes; polydendrocytes

Funding

  1. Grant Agency of the Czech Republic [GACR: 309/08/1381, GACR P304/12/G069]
  2. Grant Agency of the Charles University in Prague [GAUK 604212]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Glutamate receptors of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) type are involved in many cognitive processes, including behavior, learning and synaptic plasticity. For a long time NMDA receptors were thought to be the privileged domain of neurons; however, discoveries of the last 25 years have demonstrated their active role in glial cells as well. Despite the large number of studies in the field, there are many unresolved questions connected with NMDA receptors in glia that are still a matter of debate. The main objective of this review is to shed light on these controversies by summarizing results from all relevant works concerning astrocytes, oligodendrocytes and polydendrocytes (also known as NG2 glial cells) in experimental animals, further extended by studies performed on human glia. The results are divided according to the study approach to enable a better comparison of how findings obtained at the mRNA level correspond with protein expression or functionality. Furthermore, special attention is focused on the NMDA receptor subunits present in the particular glial cell types, which give them special characteristics different from those of neurons - for example, the absence of Mg2+ block and decreased Ca2+ permeability. Since glial cells are implicated in important physiological and pathophysiological roles in the central nervous system (CNS), the last part of this review provides an overview of glial NMDA receptors with respect to ischemic brain injury.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available