4.4 Review

Pathophysiology of Neurodegeneration in Familial Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Journal

CURRENT MOLECULAR MEDICINE
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages 255-272

Publisher

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/156652409787847173

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Motor Neuron Disease Research Institute of Australia
  2. Motor Neuron Disease Association of NSW
  3. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [510233]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder of the motor neurons in the spinal cord, brainstem, and motor cortex. Ten percent of ALS cases are familial, with both autosomal dominant and recessive modes of inheritance reported. Mutations in the copper/zinc superoxide-dismutase-1 (SOD-1) gene, the first gene linked with ALS, result in the classical ALS phenotype. To date, 135 mutations have been identified in the SOD-1 gene, accounting for similar to 20% of familial ALS cases. Mutations are widely distributed throughout the gene with preponderance for exon 4 and 5. Although mutations result in a toxic gain of function of the SOD-1 enzyme, which normally functions as a free radical scavenger, the mechanisms underlying motor neuron degeneration have not been clearly elucidated. Evidence is emerging of a complex interaction between genetic and molecular factors, with resultant damage of critical target proteins and organelles within the motor neuron. The clinical effectiveness afforded by anti-glutamatergic agents such as riluzole, suggests that glutamate excitotoxicity contributes to neurodegeneration in ALS, with glutamate excitotoxicity mediated via corticomotoneurons that provide a direct link between the motor cortex and the spinal motor neuron. This review provides an overview of the genetics of ALS, and describes recent advances in the understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying neurodegeneration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available