4.6 Review

Physicochemical Strategies for Inhibition of Amyloid Fibril Formation: An Overview of Recent Advances

Journal

CURRENT MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 19, Issue 24, Pages 4157-4174

Publisher

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/092986712802430018

Keywords

Amyloid inhibition; amyloid-related disease; protein aggregation; assembly; fibril; hydrostatic pressure; laser irradiation; metal chelator; nanomaterial; biomolecule; peptide; protein; nucleic acid; saccharide; polyphenols

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [20806057, 31071509]
  2. Programme of Introducing Talents of Discipline [B06006]
  3. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2012BAD29B05, 2012AA06A303]
  4. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in Chinese University [NCET-11-0372]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Protein aggregation and amyloid fibrillation can lead to several serious human diseases and protein drug ineffectiveness. The complexity and dynamics of protein folding present unique challenges for elucidating the molecular mechanisms involved in protein aggregation and designing effective amyloid inhibitors. Continuous development of creative approaches to identify an ultimate solution for controlling protein aggregation in biopharmaceuticals and clinical pathology is clearly required. This review describes and discusses the most recent advances on the physicochemical strategies for inhibiting protein aggregation and amyloid fibrillation, with emphasis on giving a brief overview of creative approaches and chemistries used. Physical strategies for inhibiting amyloid fibril formation, including high hydrostatic pressure, low temperature, and laser irradiation, are critically evaluated. Recent advances in chemical strategies including small molecules, metal chelators, and nanomaterials, as well as in the use of biomolecules (peptide, protein, nucleic acid, and saccharide) as amyloid inhibitors, are also highlighted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available