4.6 Review

Recent Approaches to Improve the Antitumor Efficacy of Temozolomide

Journal

CURRENT MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages 245-257

Publisher

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/092986709787002718

Keywords

Temozolomide; poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase; chemotherapy; cancer; drug resistance; DNA repair

Funding

  1. Italian Ministry of University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Temozolomide (TMZ) is an oral anticancer agent approved for the treatment of newly diagnosed glioblastoma in combination with radiotherapy. Moreover, TMZ has shown comparable efficacy with respect to dacarbazine, the reference drug for metastatic melanoma. Due to its favorable toxicity and pharmacokinetic profile, TMZ is under clinical investigation for brain metastasis from solid tumors and refractory leukemias. TMZ interacts with DNA generating a wide spectrum of methyl adducts mainly represented by N-methylpurines. However, its antitumor activity has been mainly attributed to O-6-methylguanine, since tumor cell sensitivity inversely correlates with the levels of O-6-alkylguanine DNA alkyltransferase and requires an intact mismatch repair system. Therefore, an increasing number of studies have been performed in order to identify patients who will benefit from TMZ treatment on the basis of their molecular/genetic profile. Unfortunately, resistance to the methylating agent occurs relatively often and strongly affects the rate and durability of the clinical response in cancer patients. Thus, different approaches have been developed to abrogate resistance or to increase the efficacy of TMZ and for many of them investigation is still underway. Herein, we provide an overview on the recent findings of preclinical and clinical studies on TMZ in combination with inhibitors of DNA repair, chemotherapeutic drugs with different mechanisms of action or radiotherapy, anti-angiogenic agents and other biological modulators.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available