4.3 Review

New guidelines for topical NSAIDs in the osteoarthritis treatment paradigm

Journal

CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION
Volume 26, Issue 12, Pages 2871-2876

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1185/03007995.2010.533650

Keywords

Guidelines; Hand osteoarthritis; Knee osteoarthritis; Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; Topical administration

Funding

  1. Novartis
  2. Ferring
  3. Endo
  4. Rottapharma
  5. Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., Chadds Ford, PA, USA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Osteoarthritis (OA), the most common form of arthritis, often affects hands, hips, and knees and involves an estimated 26.9 million US adults. Women have a higher prevalence of OA, and the risk of developing OA increases with age, obesity, and joint malalignment. OA typically presents with pain and reduced function. Therapeutic programs are often multimodal and must take into account pharmaceutical toxicities and patient comorbidities. For example, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are associated with cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, and renal adverse events. Topical NSAIDs offer efficacy with reduced systemic drug exposure. Research design and methods This is a review of current guideline recommendations regarding the use of topical NSAIDs in OA of the hand and knee. Articles were identified by PubMed search (January 1, 2000 to May 21, 2010). Results: Several current guidelines for management of OA recommend topical NSAIDs, indicating them as a safe and effective treatment. One guideline recommends that topical NSAIDs be considered as first-line pharmacologic therapy. A US guideline for knee OA recommends topical NSAIDs in older patients and in patients with increased gastrointestinal risk. Conclusions: The consensus across US and European OA guidelines is that topical NSAIDs are a safe and effective treatment for OA. Because the research base on topical NSAIDs for OA is small, guidelines will continue to evolve.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available