4.3 Article

A cost-effectiveness analysis of antimicrobial treatment of community-acquired pneumonia taking into account resistance in Belgium

Journal

CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages 737-751

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1185/030079908X273336

Keywords

antimicrobial resistance; community-acquired pneumonia; cost-effectiveness analysis; decision analytic model; moxifloxacin

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: This article assesses the cost-effectiveness of outpatient antimicrobial treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) taking into account resistance in Belgium. Research design and methods: Our decision analytic model focused on mild to moderate CAP, but did not consider severe CAR Treatment pathways reflected empirical treatment initiated in the absence of data on CAP aetiology. First-line treatment consisted of moxifloxacin, co-amoxiclav, cefuroxime or clarithromycin. If first-line treatment was unsuccessful, patients were either hospitalised or second-line treatment with a different antimicrobial was initiated. Clinical failure rates were obtained from the published literature or expert opinion. Costs were calculated using published sources from the third-party payer perspective. Main outcome measures: Effectiveness measures included first-line clinical failure avoided, second-line treatment avoided, hospitalisation avoided and death avoided. Healthcare costs were included, but costs of productivity loss were not considered. Results: Costs of treating a CAP episode amounted to 144 epsilon with moxifloxacin/co-amoxiclav; 222 epsilon with co-amoxiclav/clarithromycin; 211 epsilon with cefuroxime/moxifloxacin; and 199 epsilon with clarithromycin/moxifloxacin. The rate of first-line failure was 5%,16%,19% and 18% for these four treatment strategies, respectively. The rate of second-line treatment amounted to 4%, 13%, 16% and 15%, respectively. The hospitalisation rate was 1%, 4%, 4% and 4%, respectively. The death rate was 0.01%, 0.04%, 0.03% and 0.03%, respectively. Sensitivity analyses supported the dominance of moxifloxacin/co-amoxiclav in nearly all scenarios. Conclusions: First-line treatment of CAP patients with moxifloxacin followed by co-amoxiclav or hospitalisation if required was more effective and less costly as compared with first-line treatment with co-amoxiclav, cefuroxime or clarithromycin.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available