4.0 Article

Impact of Prior HAART Use on Clinical Outcomes in a Large Kenyan HIV Treatment Program

Journal

CURRENT HIV RESEARCH
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages 441-446

Publisher

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/157016209788680552

Keywords

Africa; HAART; HIV-1; clinic flow; experience; mortality

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [K23 AI065222, P30 AI027757, 5K23AI065222-04, K23 AI065222-04] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NICHD NIH HHS [K24 HD054314-03, K24 HD054314] Funding Source: Medline
  3. PHS HHS [U62/CCU024512-04] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: HIV treatment programs in Africa typically approach all enrolling patients uniformly. Growing numbers of patients are antiretroviral experienced. Defining patients on the basis of antiretroviral experience may inform enrollment practices, particularly if medical outcomes differ. Methods: Baseline and follow-up measures (CD4, weight change, and survival) were compared in a retrospective analysis between antiretroviral-naive (ARV-N) and antiretroviral experience (ARV-E) patients enrolled at the Coptic Hope Center for Infectious Diseases in Nairobi, Kenya and followed between January 2004 and August 2006. Results: 1,307 ARV-N and 962 ARV-E patients receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) were followed for median of 9 months (interquartile range: 4-16 months). Compared to ARV-N, ARV-E had substantially higher CD4 count (median cells/mm(3), 193 versus 95, P < 0.001) and weight (median kg, 62 versus 57, P < 0.001) at baseline, and lower rates of change in CD4 (-9.2 cells/mm(3)/month; 95% CI, -11.4--7.0) and weight (-0.24 kg/month; 95% CI, -0.35--0.14) over 12 months. Mortality was significantly higher in ARV-N than ARV-E (P = 0.001). Conclusions: ARV-E patients form a growing group that differs significantly from ARV-N patients and requires a distinct approach from ARV-N clients. Systematic approaches to streamline care of ARV-E patients may allow focused attention on early ARV-N clients whose mortality risks are substantially higher.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available