4.2 Article

Involvement of putative response regulator genes of the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae in osmotic stress response, fungicide action, and pathogenicity

Journal

CURRENT GENETICS
Volume 54, Issue 4, Pages 185-195

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00294-008-0211-0

Keywords

two-component system; Pyriculariae oryzae; HOG pathway; phenylpyrrole fungicide; melanin

Funding

  1. Ecomolecular Science Research Program of RIKEN
  2. MEXT.KAKENHI [19.07626]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rice blast fungus (Magnaporthe oryzae) has ten histidine kinases (HKs), one histidine-containing phospho-transfer protein (HPt), and three response regulators (RRs) as putative components of the two-component signal transduction system (TCS). Here, we constructed knockout mutants of two putative RR genes (MoSSK1, MoSKN7) and a RR homolog gene (MoRIM15) to analyze the roles of TCS in environmental adaptation and pathogenicity. The Delta Mossk1 strain had increased sensitivity to high osmolarity and decreased sensitivity to fludioxonil. The Delta Moskn7 strain had slightly decreased sensitivity to fludioxonil. The involvement of MoSkn7 in the osmoresponse was obvious only on the Delta Mossk1 background. These results show that MoSsk1 and MoSkn7 are major and minor contributors, respectively, in the high osmolarity response and fludioxonil action. The Delta Mossk1 strain was more osmosensitive than the predicted upstream HK gene disruptant Delta hik1, which shows sugar-specific high osmolarity sensitivity. The Delta Mossk1 and Delta Moskn7 strains showed enhanced hyphal melanization, suggesting that RRs regulate hyphal melanization. MoSsk1 and MoRim15 are required for full virulence, because the Delta Mossk1 and Delta Morim15 strains exhibited reduced virulence. These results suggest that the putative RRs of the rice blast fungus are involved in the osmotic stress response, fludioxonil action, and pathogenicity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available