4.7 Review

Optimizing treatment success in multiple sclerosis

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY
Volume 263, Issue 6, Pages 1053-1065

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-015-7986-y

Keywords

Brain atrophy; Disability evaluation; Drug therapy; Multiple sclerosis

Funding

  1. Novartis Pharma AG
  2. Almirall
  3. Bayer Healthcare
  4. Biogen
  5. Merck Sharp & Dohme Merck Serono
  6. Teva
  7. Genzyme
  8. Synthon
  9. Bayer Schering
  10. Biogen-Idec
  11. Merck Serono
  12. Novartis Pharma
  13. Swiss National Foundation
  14. European Union
  15. Swiss MS Society
  16. Italian MS Society
  17. AbbVie
  18. Bayer Schering Healthcare
  19. Biogen Idec
  20. Canbex
  21. Eisai
  22. Elan
  23. Five Prime Therapeutics
  24. Genentech
  25. GlaxoSmithKline
  26. Ironwood Pharmaceuticals
  27. Merck-Serono
  28. Novartis
  29. Pfizer
  30. Roche
  31. Sanofi-Aventis
  32. Synthon BV
  33. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries
  34. UCB
  35. Vertex Pharmaceuticals
  36. Acorda
  37. Avanir
  38. Congrex
  39. Consortium of MS Centers
  40. DeltaQuest
  41. EMD Serono
  42. EMD Serono, Genentech
  43. Janssen Research
  44. Krog Partners
  45. MedImmune
  46. NIH
  47. Novartis Canada
  48. Novartis Japan
  49. Ono
  50. Oxford Pharmagenesis
  51. Rocky Mountain MS Center
  52. Vaccinex
  53. Xenoport
  54. Sanofi
  55. Betty and David Koetser Foundation for Brain Research
  56. Clinical Research Priority Programme of the University of Zurich

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite important advances in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) over recent years, the introduction of several disease-modifying therapies (DMTs), the burden of progressive disability and premature mortality associated with the condition remains substantial. This burden, together with the high healthcare and societal costs associated with MS, creates a compelling case for early treatment optimization with highly efficacious therapies. Often, patients receive several first-line therapies, while more recent and in part more effective treatments are still being introduced only after these have failed. However, with the availability of highly efficacious therapies, a novel treatment strategy has emerged, where the aim is to achieve no evidence of disease activity (NEDA). Achieving NEDA necessitates regular monitoring of relapses, disability and functionality. However, there is only a poor correlation between conventional magnetic resonance imaging measures like T2 hyperintense lesion burden and the level of clinical disability. Hence, MRI-based measures of brain atrophy have emerged in recent years potentially reflecting the magnitude of MS-related neuroaxonal damage. Currently available DMTs differ markedly in their effects on brain atrophy: some, such as fingolimod, have been shown to significantly slow brain volume loss, compared to placebo, whereas others have shown either no, inconsistent, or delayed effects. In addition to regular monitoring, treatment optimization also requires early intervention with efficacious therapies, because accumulating evidence shows that effective intervention during a limited period early in the course of MS is critical for maintaining neurological function and preventing subsequent disability. Together, the advent of new MS therapies and evolving management strategies offer exciting new opportunities to optimize treatment outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available