4.3 Article

Incorporation of Pharmacogenomics into Routine Clinical Practice: the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) Guideline Development Process

Journal

CURRENT DRUG METABOLISM
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages 209-217

Publisher

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/1389200215666140130124910

Keywords

Clinical practice guideline; guideline; pharmacogenetics; pharmacogenomics

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health/National Institute of General Medical Science (NIH/NIGMS) (PAAR4Kids) [UO1 GM92666]
  2. National Institutes of Health/National Institute of General Medical Science (NIH/NIGMS) (PharmGKB) [R24 GM61374]
  3. Brain & Behavior Research Foundation Award
  4. CIHR Michael Smith New Investigator Salary Prize for Research in Schizophrenia
  5. Ontario Mental Health Foundation New Investigator Fellowship
  6. Ministry of Research and Innovation of Ontario
  7. Swedish Research Council [523-2008-5568, 521-2011-2440]
  8. Fondo de Investigacion Sanitaria, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain [PI12/00241, RETICS RD12/0013/0002]
  9. NIH [T32 GM007569/GM/NIGMS]
  10. NIH NIGMS [K23GM104401]
  11. NIH/NIGMS [U19 GM61388]
  12. [U19 HL065962]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) publishes genotype-based drug guidelines to help clinicians understand how available genetic test results could be used to optimize drug therapy. CPIC has focused initially on well-known examples of pharmacogenomic associations that have been implemented in selected clinical settings, publishing nine to date. Each CPIC guideline adheres to a standardized format and includes a standard system for grading levels of evidence linking genotypes to phenotypes and assigning a level of strength to each prescribing recommendation. CPIC guidelines contain the necessary information to help clinicians translate patient-specific diplotypes for each gene into clinical phenotypes or drug dosing groups. This paper reviews the development process of the CPIC guidelines and compares this process to the Institute of Medicine's Standards for Developing Trustworthy Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available