4.8 Article

Meiotic Adaptation to Genome Duplication in Arabidopsis arenosa

Journal

CURRENT BIOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 21, Pages 2151-2156

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.08.059

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Harvard University Milton Fund Award
  2. Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Awards from the National Institutes of Health [1 F32 GM096699, 1 F32 GM105293]
  3. BBSRC, UK
  4. BBSRC [BB/K007505/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/K007505/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Whole genome duplication (WGD) is a major factor in the evolution of multicellular eukaryotes, yet by doubling the number of homologs, WGD severely challenges reliable chromosome segregation [1-3], a process conserved across kingdoms [4]. Despite this, numerous genome-duplicated (polyploid) species persist in nature, indicating early problems can be overcome [1, 2]. Little is known about which genes are involved only one has been molecularly characterized [5]. To gain new insights into the molecular basis of adaptation to polyploidy, we investigated genome-wide patterns of differentiation between natural diploids and tetraploids of Arabidopsis arenosa, an outcrossing relative of A. thaliana [6, 7]. We first show that diploids are not preadapted to polyploid meiosis. We then use a genome scanning approach to show that although polymorphism is extensively shared across ploidy levels, there is strong ploidy-specific differentiation in 39 regions spanning 44 genes. These are discrete, mostly single-gene peaks of sharply elevated differentiation. Among these peaks are eight meiosis genes whose encoded proteins coordinate a specific subset of early meiotic functions, suggesting these genes comprise a polygenic solution to WGD-associated chromosome segregation challenges. Our findings indicate that even conserved meiotic processes can be capable of nimble evolutionary shifts when required.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available