4.8 Article

In Vivo Monitoring of Peripheral Circadian Clocks in the Mouse

Journal

CURRENT BIOLOGY
Volume 22, Issue 11, Pages 1029-1034

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.04.009

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Japan Society of the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [23-4625, 23300278, 23659126]
  2. Mishima-Kaiun Foundation
  3. Fuji Foundation for Protein Research
  4. Iijima Memorial Foundation for the Promotion of Food Science and Technology
  5. High-Tech Research Centre for Waseda University
  6. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan
  7. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23659126, 23300278] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The mammalian circadian system is comprised of a central clock in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) and a network of peripheral oscillators located in all of the major organ systems [1, 2]. The SCN is traditionally thought to be positioned at the top of the hierarchy, with SCN lesions resulting in an arrhythmic organism [3]. However, recent work has demonstrated that the SCN and peripheral tissues generate independent circadian oscillations in Pen l clock gene expression in vitro [4]. In the present study, we sought to clarify the role of the SCN in the intact system by recording rhythms in clock gene expression in vivo. A practical imaging protocol was developed that enables us to measure circadian rhythms easily, noninvasively, and longitudinally in individual mice. Circadian oscillations were detected in the kidney, liver, and submandibular gland studied in about half of the SCN-lesioned, behaviorally arrhythmic mice. However, their amplitude was decreased in these organs. Free-running periods of peripheral clocks were identical to those of activity rhythms recorded before the SCN lesion. Thus, we can report for the first time that many of the fundamental properties of circadian oscillations in peripheral clocks in vivo are maintained in the absence of SCN control.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available