4.8 Article

A PHABULOSA/Cytokinin Feedback Loop Controls Root Growth in Arabidopsis

Journal

CURRENT BIOLOGY
Volume 22, Issue 18, Pages 1699-1704

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.07.005

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Federation of European Biochemical Societies
  2. University of Oxford Glasstone Research Fellowship
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council Career Development Fellowship [BB/G023905/1, BB/F012934/1]
  4. European Molecular Biology Organization Young Investigator Programme
  5. Royal Society Wolfson Merit Award
  6. Max Planck Society core grant
  7. European Commission (FP7-ITN SIREN) [214788-2]
  8. Human Frontier Science Program [RGP0047/2010]
  9. BBSRC [BB/G023905/1, BB/F012934/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. EPSRC [EP/I017909/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  11. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/F012934/1, BB/G023905/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  12. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/I017909/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The hormone cytokinin (CK) controls root length in Arabidopsis thaliana by defining where dividing cells, derived from stem cells of the root meristem, start to differentiate [1-6]. However, the regulatory inputs directing CK to promote differentiation remain poorly understood. Here, we show that the HD-ZIPIII transcription factor PHABULOSA (PHB) directly activates the CK biosynthesis gene ISOPENTENYL TRANSFERASE 7 (IPT7), thus promoting cell differentiation and regulating root length. We further demonstrate that CK feeds back to repress both PHB and microRNA165, a negative regulator of PHB. These interactions comprise an incoherent regulatory loop in which CK represses both its activator and a repressor of its activator. We propose that this regulatory circuit determines the balance of cell division and differentiation during root development and may provide robustness against CK fluctuations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available