4.8 Article

Geminin Escapes Degradation in G1 of Mouse Pluripotent Cells and Mediates the Expression of Oct4, Sox2, and Nanog

Journal

CURRENT BIOLOGY
Volume 21, Issue 8, Pages 692-699

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.03.026

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A(star)STAR, Singapore)
  2. Medical Research Council
  3. Cancer Research UK
  4. MRC [MC_U105359878] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Medical Research Council [MC_U105359878] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Geminin is an essential cell-cycle protein that is only present from S phase to early mitosis in metazoan somatic cells [1, 2]. Genetic ablation of geminin in the mouse results in preimplantation embryonic lethality because pluripotent cells fail to form and all cells differentiate to trophoblast [3, 4]. Here we show that geminin is present in G1 phase of mouse pluripotent cells in contrast to somatic cells, where anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C)-mediated proteasomal destruction removes geminin in G1 [1, 2, 5]. Silencing geminin directly or by depleting the APC/C inhibitor Emi1 causes loss of stem cell identity and trophoblast differentiation of mouse embryonal carcinoma and embryonic stem cells. Depletion of cyclins A2 or B1 does not induce this effect, even though both of these APC/C substrates are also present during G1 of pluripotent cells. Crucially, geminin antagonizes the chromatin-remodeling protein Brg1 to maintain expression of Oct4, Sox2, and Nanog. Our results define a pluripotency pathway by which suppressed APC/C activity protects geminin from degradation in G1, allowing sustained expression of core pluripotency factors. Collectively, these findings link the cell cycle to the pluripotent state but also raise an unexplained paradox: How is cell-cycle progression possible in pluripotent cells when oscillations of key regulatory proteins are lost?

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available