4.8 Article

Multiple TGF-β Superfamily Signals Modulate the Adult Drosophila Immune Response

Journal

CURRENT BIOLOGY
Volume 21, Issue 19, Pages 1672-1677

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.08.048

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/E02128X/1]
  3. BBSRC [BB/E02128X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. MRC [G0900867] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/E02128X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Medical Research Council [G0900867] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

TGF-beta superfamily signals play complex roles in regulation of tissue repair and inflammation in mammals [1]. Drosophila melanogaster is a well-established model for the study of innate immune function [2, 3] and wound healing [4-7]. Here, we explore the role and regulation of two TGF-beta superfamily members, dawdle and decapentaplegic (dpp), in response to wounding and infection in adult Drosophila. We find that both TGF-beta signals exhibit complex regulation in response to wounding and infection, each is expressed in a subset of phagocytes, and each inhibits a specific arm of the immune response. dpp is rapidly activated by wounds and represses the production of antimicrobial peptides; flies lacking dpp function display persistent, strong antimicrobial peptide expression after even a small wound. dawdle, in contrast, is activated by Gram-positive bacterial infection but repressed by Gram-negative infection or wounding; its role is to limit infection-induced melanization. Flies lacking dawdle function exhibit melanization even when uninfected. Together, these data imply a model in which the bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) dpp is an important inhibitor of inflammation following sterile injury whereas the activin-like dawdle determines the nature of the induced immune response.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available