4.8 Article

Regenerant Arabidopsis Lineages Display a Distinct Genome-Wide Spectrum of Mutations Conferring Variant Phenotypes

Journal

CURRENT BIOLOGY
Volume 21, Issue 16, Pages 1385-1390

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.07.002

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust [090532/Z/09/Z]
  2. King Abdullah University of Science and Technology [KUK-11-002-03]
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) [BB/F020759/1, BB/F022697/1]
  4. BBSRC [BB/F020759/1, BB/F022697/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/F022697/1, BB/F020759/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Multicellular organisms can be regenerated from totipotent differentiated somatic cell or nuclear founders [1-3]. Organisms regenerated from clonally related isogenic founders might a priori have been expected to be phenotypically invariant. However, clonal regenerant animals display variant phenotypes caused by defective epigenetic reprogramming of gene expression [2], and clonal regenerant plants exhibit poorly understood heritable phenotypic (somaclonal) variation [4-7]. Here we show that somaclonal variation in regenerant Arabidopsis lineages is associated with genome-wide elevation in DNA sequence mutation rate. We also show that regenerant mutations comprise a distinctive molecular spectrum of base substitutions, insertions, and deletions that probably results from decreased DNA repair fidelity. Finally, we show that while regenerant base substitutions are a likely major genetic cause of the somaclonal variation of regenerant Arabidopsis lineages, transposon movement is unlikely to contribute substantially to that variation. We conclude that the phenotypic variation of regenerant plants, unlike that of regenerant animals, is substantially due to DNA sequence mutation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available