4.8 Article

A Gαq-Ca2+ Signaling Pathway Promotes Actin-Mediated Epidermal Wound Closure in C. elegans

Journal

CURRENT BIOLOGY
Volume 21, Issue 23, Pages 1960-1967

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.10.050

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 GM54657]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Repair of skin wounds is essential for animals to survive in a harsh environment, yet the signaling pathways initiating wound repair in vivo remain little understood. In Caenorhabditis elegans, a p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascade promotes innate immune responses to wounding but is not required for other aspects of wound healing. We therefore set out to identify additional wound response pathways in C. elegans epidermis. Results: We show here that wounding the adult C. elegans skin triggers a rapid and sustained rise in epidermal Ca2+ that is critical for survival after wounding. The wound-triggered rise in Ca2+ requires the epidermal transient receptor potential channel, melastatin family (TRPM) channel GTL-2 and IP3R-stimulated release from internal stores. We identify an epidermal signal transduction pathway that includes the G alpha(q) EGL-30 and its effector PLC beta EGL-8. Loss of function in this pathway impairs survival after wounding. The G alpha(q)-Ca2+ pathway is not required for known innate immune responses to wounding but instead promotes actin-dependent wound closure. Wound closure requires the Cdc42 small GTPase and Arp2/3-dependent actin polymerization and is negatively regulated by Rho and nonmuscle myosin. Finally, we show that the death-associated protein kinase DAPK-1 acts as a negative regulator of wound closure. Conclusions: Skin wounding in C. elegans triggers a Ca2+-dependent signaling cascade that promotes wound closure, in parallel to the innate immune response to damage. Wound closure requires actin polymerization and is negatively regulated by nonmuscle myosin.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available