4.8 Article

Characterization and Coding of Behaviorally Significant Odor Mixtures

Journal

CURRENT BIOLOGY
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages 335-340

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.01.041

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Direct For Biological Sciences
  2. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems [0822709] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  3. NIDCD NIH HHS [DC-02751, R01 DC002751, R01 DC002751-14A1] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIGMS NIH HHS [2 K12 GM000708-06, K12 GM000708] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

For animals to execute odor-driven behaviors, the olfactory system must process complex odor signals and maintain stimulus identity in the face of constantly changing odor intensities [1-5]. Surprisingly, how the olfactory system maintains identity of complex odors is unclear [6-10]. We took advantage of the plant-pollinator relationship between the Sacred Datura (Datura wrightii) and the moth Manduca sexta [11, 12] to determine how olfactory networks in this insect's brain represent odor mixtures. We combined gas chromatography and neural-ensemble recording in the moth's antennal lobe to examine population codes for the floral mixture and its fractionated components. Although the floral scent of D. wrightii comprises at least 60 compounds, only nine of those elicited robust neural responses. Behavioral experiments confirmed that these nine odorants mediate flower-foraging behaviors, but only as a mixture. Moreover, the mixture evoked equivalent foraging behaviors over a 1000-fold range in dilution, suggesting a singular percept across this concentration range. Furthermore, neural-ensemble recordings in the moth's antennal lobe revealed that reliable encoding of the floral mixture is organized through synchronized activity distributed across a population of glomerular coding units, and this timing mechanism may bind the features of a complex stimulus into a coherent odor percept.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available