4.8 Article

Ancestral TSH mechanism signals summer in a photoperiodic mammal

Journal

CURRENT BIOLOGY
Volume 18, Issue 15, Pages 1147-1152

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.06.076

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. MRC [G0600678] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council Funding Source: Medline
  3. Medical Research Council [G0600678] Funding Source: Medline
  4. Medical Research Council [G0600678] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In mammals, day-length-sensitive (photoperiodic) seasonal breeding cycles depend on the pineal hormone melatonin, which modulates secretion of reproductive hormones by the anterior pituitary gland [1]. It is thought that melatonin acts in the hypothalamus to control reproduction through the release of neurosecretory signals into the pituitary portal blood supply, where they act on pituitary endocrine cells [2]. Contrastingly, we show here that during the reproductive response of Soay sheep exposed to summer day lengths, the reverse applies: Melatonin acts directly on anterior-pituitary cells, and these then relay the photoperiodic message back into the hypothalamus to control neuroendocrine output. The switch to long clays causes melatonin-responsive cells in the pars tuberalis (PT) of the anterior pituitary to increase production of thyrotrophin (TSH). This acts locally on TSH-receptor-expressing cells in the adjacent mediobasal hypothalamus, leading to increased expression of type 11 thyroid hormone deiodinase (13102). DIO2 initiates the summer response by increasing hypothalamic tri-iodothyronine (T3) levels. These data and recent findings in quail [3] indicate that the TSH-expressing cells of the PT play an ancestral role in seasonal reproductive control in vertebrates. In mammals this provides the missing link between the pineal melatonin signal and thyroid-dependent seasonal biology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available