4.8 Article

Organelles in Blastocystis that blur the distinction between mitochondria and hydrogenosomes

Journal

CURRENT BIOLOGY
Volume 18, Issue 8, Pages 580-585

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.03.037

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust [078566, 078566/A/05/Z] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Wellcome Trust [078566/A/05/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Blastocystis is a unicellular stramenopile of controversial pathogenicity in humans (1, 2]. Although it is a strict anaerobe, Blastocystis has mitochondrion-like organelles with cristae, a transmembrane potential and DNA [2-4]. An apparent lack of several typical mitochondrial pathways has led some to suggest that these organelles might be hydrogenosomes, anaerobic organelles related to mitochondria [5, 6]. We generated 12,767 expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from Blastocystis and identified 115 clusters that encode putative mitochondrial and hydrogenosomal proteins. Among these is the canonical hydrogenosomal protein iron-only [FeFe] hydrogenase that we show localizes to the organelles. The organelles also have mitochondrial characteristics, including pathways for amino acid metabolism, iron-sulfur cluster biogenesis, and an incomplete tricarboxylic acid cycle as well as a mitochondrial genome. Although complexes I and 11 of the electron transport chain (ETC) are present, we found no evidence for complexes III and IV or F1F0 ATPases. The Blastocystis organelles have metabolic properties of aerobic and anaerobic mitochondria and of hydrogenosomes [7,8]. They are convergently similar to organelles recently described in the unrelated ciliate Nyctotherus ovalis [9]. These findings blur the boundaries between mitochondria, hydrogenosomes, and mitosomes, as currently defined, underscoring the disparate selective forces that shape these organelles in eukaryotes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available