4.8 Article

Influence of uncertainty and surprise on human corticospinal excitability during preparation for action

Journal

CURRENT BIOLOGY
Volume 18, Issue 10, Pages 775-780

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.04.051

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. ESRC [RES-000-23-1571] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. MRC [G0500258] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Economic and Social Research Council [RES-000-23-1571] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. Medical Research Council [G0500258] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Medical Research Council [G0500258] Funding Source: Medline
  6. Wellcome Trust [088130] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Actions are guided by prior sensory information [1-10], which is inherently uncertain. However, how the motor system is sculpted by trial-by-trial content of current sensory information remains largely unexplored. Previous work suggests that conditional probabilities, learned under a particular context, can be used preemptively to influence the output of the motor system [11-14]. To test this we used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to read out corticospinal excitability (CSE) during preparation for action in an instructed delay task [15,16]. We systematically varied the uncertainty about an impending action by changing the validity of the instructive visual cue. We used two information-theoretic quantities to predict changes in CSE, prior to action, on a trial-by-trial basis: entropy (average uncertainty) and surprise (the stimulus-bound information conveyed by a visual cue) [17-19]. Our data show that during preparation for action, human CSE varies according to the entropy and surprise conveyed by visual events guiding action. CSE increases on trials with low entropy about the impending action and low surprise conveyed by an event. Commensurate effects were observed in reaction times. We suggest that motor output is biased according to contextual probabilities that are represented dynamically in the brain.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available