4.8 Article

The Homotetrameric Kinesin-5 KLP61F Preferentially Crosslinks Microtubules into Antiparallel Orientations

Journal

CURRENT BIOLOGY
Volume 18, Issue 23, Pages 1860-1864

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.10.026

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO)
  2. Research Council for Earth and Life Sciences
  3. National Institutes of Health [GM55507]
  4. German Research Foundation (DFG) Center for the Molecular Physiology of the Brain (CMPB)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The segregation of genetic material during mitosis is coordinated by the mitotic spindle, whose action depends upon the polarity patterns of its microtubules (MTs) [1, 2]. Homotetrameric mitotic kinesin-5 motors can crosslink and slide adjacent spindle MTs [3-11], but it is unknown whether they or other motors contribute to establishing these MT polarity patterns. Here, we explored whether the Drosophila embryo kinesin-5 KLP61F, which plausibly crosslinks both parallel and antiparallel MTs [7,12], displays a preference for parallel or antiparallel MT orientation. In motility assays, KLP61F was observed to crosslink and slide adjacent MTs, as predicted. Remarkably, KLP61F displayed a 3-fold higher preference for crosslinking MTs in the antiparallel orientation. This polarity preference was observed in the presence of ADP or ATP plus AMPPNP, but not AMPPNP alone, which induces instantaneous rigor binding. Also, a purified motorless tetramer containing the C-terminal tail domains displayed an antiparallel orientation preference, confirming that motor activity is not required. The results suggest that, during morphogenesis of the Drosophila embryo mitotic spindle, KLP61F's crosslinking and sliding activities could facilitate the gradual accumulation of KLP61F within antiparallel inter-polar MTs at the equator, where the motor could generate force to drive poleward flux and pole-pole separation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available