4.4 Review

The Role of Glycemic Index and Glycemic Load In Cardiovascular Disease And Its Risk Factors: A Review of The Recent Literature

Journal

CURRENT ATHEROSCLEROSIS REPORTS
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

CURRENT MEDICINE GROUP
DOI: 10.1007/s11883-013-0381-1

Keywords

Glycemic index; Glycemic load; Cardiovascular disease risk; Review

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
  2. CIHR
  3. Saskatchewan Pulse Growers
  4. Pulse Canada
  5. Agri-Culture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC)
  6. Calorie Control Council
  7. Coca-Cola Company (investigator initiated, unrestricted grant)
  8. International Tree Nut Council Nutrition Research & Education Foundation
  9. American Heart Association (AHA)
  10. American Society for Nutrition ASN
  11. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
  12. National Institutes of Health (NIH)
  13. Canadian Diabetes Association (CDA)
  14. Canadian Nutrition Society (CNS)
  15. Diabetes and Nutrition Study Group (DNSG) of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD)
  16. International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI) North America
  17. International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI) Brazil
  18. Abbott Laboratories
  19. Dr. Pepper Snapple Group
  20. Coca-Cola Company
  21. scientific advisory board for Abbott, the Advanced Food Materials Network (AFMNet)
  22. Almond Board of California
  23. American Peanut Council
  24. American Pistachio Growers, Barilla
  25. California Strawberry Commission
  26. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  27. Canola Council of Canada
  28. Danone
  29. General Mills
  30. Hain Celestial
  31. International Tree Nut Council, Kellogg's, Loblaw Brands, Ltd
  32. Oldways
  33. Orafti
  34. Paramount Farms
  35. Saskatchewan Pulse Growers,
  36. Solae
  37. Unilever. David Jenkins has served on the Scientific Advisory Board of Sanitarium Company, AAFC
  38. Canadian Agriculture Policy Institute (CAPI)
  39. Loblaw Supermarket
  40. Herbal Life International
  41. Nutritional Fundamental for Health, Pacific Health Laboratories
  42. Metagenics
  43. Bayer Consumer Care
  44. Dean Foods
  45. Kellogg's
  46. Quaker Oats
  47. Procter Gamble
  48. Coca-Cola
  49. NuVal Griffin Hospital,
  50. Abbott
  51. International Tree Nut Council Nutrition Research and Education Foundation
  52. Peanut Institute
  53. Pacific Health Laboratories
  54. Nutritional Fundamental for Health
  55. Barilla
  56. Haine Celestial
  57. Pepsi
  58. Alpro Foundation
  59. Agricultural Bioproducts Innovation Program (ABIP) through the Pulse Research Network (PURENet)
  60. AFMNet
  61. Loblaw
  62. Unilever
  63. Canola
  64. Flax Councils of Canada
  65. Canada Foundation for Innovation
  66. Ontario Research Fund
  67. Sanitarium Company
  68. Oldways Preservation Trust
  69. AAFC
  70. CAPI
  71. International Tree Nut Council, Barilla

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A number of meta-analyses of cohort studies have assessed the impact of glycemic load (GL) and glycemic index (GI) on cardiovascular outcomes. The picture that emerges is that for women, a significant association appears to exist between the consumption of high GL/GI diets and increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. This association appears to be stronger in those with greater adiposity and possibly in those with diabetes, although these findings are not uniform. There is also an indication that raised CRP levels may be reduced, which has special implications for women whose CRP levels, as an emerging CVD risk factor, may be higher than men. For men, the situation is not as clear-cut. Although some studies show association, the meta-analyses have not demonstrated a significant direct association with CVD, despite current evidence that risk factors, including LDL-C, may be reduced on low-GI diets. Moreover, in a recent meta-analysis, increases in dietary GL have been associated with increased risk of diabetes, another CVD risk factor, in both men and women. Studies in men expressing relative risk of CVD in relation to GL and GI, with corresponding confidence intervals, are needed to provide the necessary power for future meta-analyses on this topic.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available