4.4 Article

Preparation of PEO ceramic coating on Ti alloy and its high temperature oxidation resistance

Journal

CURRENT APPLIED PHYSICS
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages 698-702

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cap.2009.09.003

Keywords

Plasma electrolytic oxidation; Ceramic coatings; Thermal shock resistance; High temperature oxidation resistance; Ti-6Al-4V alloy

Funding

  1. Special Foundation for New Teachers of Doctor course in Chinese Education Ministry [200802131065]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ceramic coatings were prepared in Na2SiO3-Na2CO3-NaOH system by pulsed bi-polar plasma electrolytic oxidation on Ti-6Al-4V alloy. The phase composition, structure and the elemental distribution of the coatings were studied by XRD, SEM and energy dispersive spectroscopy, respectively. The thermal shock resistance of the coated samples at 850 degrees C was evaluated by the thermal shock tests. The high temperature oxidation resistance of the coating samples at 500 degrees C was investigated. The results showed that the coating was mainly composed of rutile- and anatase TiO2, Increasing the concentration of Na2SiO3, TiO2 content decreased gradually while the thickness of the coating increased. There were a large amount of micro pores and sintered particles on the surface of the coatings. Increasing concentration of Na2SiO3, the sintered particles on the surface turned large, and the Si content increased while the Ti content decreased gradually. When the concentration of Na2SiO3 was 15 g/L, the thermal shock resistance of the coatings was better than that of the coatings that prepared under other Na2SiO3 concentrations. The coating samples prepared under the optimized technique process based on the thermal shock tests improved the high temperature oxidation resistance at 500 degrees C greatly, whether considering the isothermal oxidation or the cyclic oxidation. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available