Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion MRI and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Grading of Gliomas

PURPOSEAccurate glioma grading is crucial for treatment planning and predicting prognosis. We performed a quantitative volumetric analysis to assess the diagnostic accuracy of histogram analysis of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) T1-weighted perfusion imaging in the preoperative evaluation of gliomas. METHODSSixty-three consecutive patients with pathologically confirmed gliomas who underwent baseline DWI and DCE-MRI were enrolled. The patients were classified by histopathology according to tumor grade: 20 low-grade gliomas (grade II) and 43 high-grade gliomas (grades III and IV). Volumes-of-interest were calculated and transferred to DCE perfusion and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps. Histogram analysis was performed to determine mean and maximum values for V-p and K-trans, and mean and minimum values for ADC. Comparisons between high-grade and low-grade gliomas, and between grades II, III, and IV, were performed. A Mann-Whitney U test at a significance level of corrected P .01 was used to assess differences. RESULTSAll perfusion parameters could differentiate between high-grade and low-grade gliomas (P < .001) and between grades II and IV, grades II and III, and grades III and IV. Significant differences in minimum ADC were also found (P < .01). Mean ADC only differed significantly between high and low grades and grades II and IV (P < .01). There were no differences between grades II and III (P = .1) and grades III and IV (P = .71). CONCLUSIONWhen derived from whole-tumor histogram analysis, DCE-MRI perfusion parameters performed better than ADC in noninvasively discriminating low- from high-grade gliomas.