4.2 Article

BACE1 Levels by APOE Genotype in Non-Demented and Alzheimer's Post-Mortem Brains

Journal

CURRENT ALZHEIMER RESEARCH
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages 309-315

Publisher

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/1567205011310030010

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease; APOE; BACE1; brain; ELISA; frontal cortex

Funding

  1. National Institute on Aging [R01AG034155, P30AG019610-09, 5P30AG019610-12]
  2. National Institute on Aging (Arizona Alzheimer's Disease Core Center) [P30 AG19610]
  3. Arizona Department of Health Services (Arizona Alzheimer's Research Center) [211002]
  4. Arizona Biomedical Research Commission [4001, 0011, 05-901, 1001]
  5. Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The APOE genotype is a known susceptibility factor for Alzheimer's disease (AD). It is apparent that the presence of the APOE epsilon 4 allele increases the risk for developing AD, lowers the age of onset in AD, and may influence the pathological burden seen in AD. In this study, we asked whether BACE1 levels differ by APOE genotype in the AD and non-demented (ND) brain. We isolated mid-frontal cortex (MFC) and mid-temporal cortex (MTC) from post-mortem ND and AD subjects that were APOE epsilon 3/3, epsilon 3/4, epsilon 4/4 carriers. All AD subjects met NINDS-ADRDA and NIA-Reagan criteria for a diagnosis of AD. The MFC and MTC were homogenized and the lysates underwent ELISA and Western blotting for BACE1. The ELISA revealed that total BACE1 levels were lower in the MFC of AD compared to ND subjects. Furthermore, in APOE epsilon 4 carriers BACE1 levels were lower than epsilon 3/3 carriers in the ND frontal cortex. No difference in BACE1 levels was observed in AD MFC and in ND and AD MTC tissues. The ELISA results were confirmed by Western blotting. Our data suggest that brain BACE1 levels may be influenced by the apolipoprotein E genotype before the onset of AD, providing an alternative explanation for the lower amyloid beta 42 levels in CSF in ND and AD subjects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available