4.3 Article

Bitransgenesis with β2-Adrenergic Receptors or Adenylyl Cyclase Fails to Improve β1-Adrenergic Receptor Cardiomyopathy

Journal

CTS-CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE
Volume 1, Issue 3, Pages 221-227

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2008.00061.x

Keywords

heart failure; beta-adrenergic receptors; adenylyl cyclase; apoptosis; transgenes

Funding

  1. NIH [HL077101]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cardiomyopathic effects of beta-adrenergic receptor (beta AR) signaling are primarily due to the beta(1)AR subtype. beta(1)/beta(2)AR and beta(1)/adenylyl cyclase type 5 (AC5) bitransgenic mice were created to test the hypothesis that beta(2)AR or AC5 co-overexpression has beneficial effects in beta(1)AR-mediated cardiomyopathy. In young mice, beta(1)/beta(2) hearts had a greater increase in basal and isoproterenol-stimulated contractility compared to beta(1)/AC5 and beta(1)AR hearts. By 6 months, beta(1)AR and beta(1)/beta(2) hearts retained elevated basal contractility but were unresponsive to agonist. In contrast, beta(1)/AC5 hearts maintained a small degree of agonist responsiveness, which may be due to a lack of beta(1)AR downregulation that was noted in beta(1)- and beta(1)/beta(2) hearts. However, by 9-months, beta(1), beta(1)/beta(2), and beta(1)/AC5 mice had all developed severely depressed fractional shortening in vivo and little response to agonist. p38 mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) was minimally activated by beta(1)AR, but was markedly enhanced in the bitransgenics. Akt activation was only found with the bitransgenics. The small increase in cystosolic second mitochondria-derived activator of caspase (Smac), indicative of apoptosis in 9-month beta(1)AR hearts, was suppressed in beta(1)/AC5, but not in beta(1)/beta(2), hearts. Taken together, the unique signaling effects of enhanced beta(2)AR and AC5, which have the potential to afford benefit in heart failure, failed to salvage ventricular function in beta(1)AR-mediated cardiomyopathy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available