4.7 Article

Efficient extraction of inorganic selenium from water by a Zr metal-organic framework: investigation of volumetric uptake capacity and binding motifs

Journal

CRYSTENGCOMM
Volume 20, Issue 40, Pages 6140-6145

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8ce00992a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Nuclear Security Administration [DE-NA0003763]
  2. Northwestern University
  3. Soft and Hybrid Nanotechnology Experimental (SHyNE) Resource [NSF ECCS-1542205]
  4. State of Illinois
  5. International Institute of Nanotechnology (IIN)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Strict monitoring and control of selenium concentrations in freshwater supplies is critical to safeguarding human health and aquatic life. A handful of previously investigated sorbents exhibit noteworthy gravimetric (mg g(-1)) Se uptake capacities; however, often display insufficient volumetric (mg cm(-3)) capacities, thereby requiring large volumes of material for commercial implementation. In pursuit of mitigating this material inefficiency, we investigated the selenite (SeO32-) and selenate (SeO42-) affinity of MOF-808, a Zr-based metal-organic framework with a high density of potential Se oxyanion binding sites. MOF-808 recorded exceptional volumetric and gravimetric Se oxyanion capacities of 133 mg g(-1) (127 mg cm(-3)) and 118 mg g(-1) (112 mg cm(-3)) for aqueous selenite and selenate, respectively. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction studies revealed that selenite and selenate can bind at the MOF node via two distinct binding motifs, an eta(2)mu(2) motif in which the oxyanion coordinates to two different metal atoms in a single node, and a mu(2) motif in which the oxyanion interacts with only a single metal atom. Furthermore, powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) patterns and N-2 adsorption/desorption isotherms confirm the retention of bulk crystallinity and porosity after the uptake of Se oxyanions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available