4.3 Article

Graphene oxide used as a surfactant to induce the flower-like ZnO microstructures: growth mechanism and enhanced photocatalytic properties

Journal

CRYSTAL RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 49, Issue 12, Pages 982-989

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/crat.201400300

Keywords

zinc hydroxide carbonate; zinc oxide; photocatalytic; surfactant; graphene oxide

Funding

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [91022032, 21171001, 21173001, 51372004, 21371003, 21101054]
  2. Lab for Clean Energy & Green Catalysis of Anhui University
  3. Important Project of Anhui Provincial Education Department [2012SQRL167ZD]
  4. Hefei Normal University [2014cxy25]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, graphene oxide (GO) was used as a temple to induce the formation of flower-like ZnO microparticals compared with surfactants, such as cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) and dodecyl dimethyl betaine (BS-12). The zinc hydroxide carbonate ((Zn-4(CO3)(OH)(6),ZHC)) was produced by a hydrothermal reaction. The flower-like ZnO microparticals were gained by calcining ZHC. In the GO medium, the microparticals were assembled by numerous porous nanosheets from one point (initial nucleus) to flower-like microparticals finally. The nanosheets of graphene oxide and functional groups were likely to contribute to the formation of the precursor, and some nanosheets were retained in the complex. The growth mechanism of ZHC was also proposed in this paper. The photocatalytic activity of the flower-like ZnO microparticals was evaluated by photo degradation reaction of rhodamine B (RhB). The peony-like porous ZnO/rGO compounds showed high photocatalytic activity and better than ZnO microparticals formed in the CTAB and BS-12. These results indicated that GO could be widely used as a surfactant to induce composite materials with special morphology and photoelectric properties, etc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available