4.7 Article

Polymorphic Co-crystals from Polymorphic Co-crystal Formers: Competition between Carboxylic Acid...Pyridine and Phenol...Pyridine Hydrogen Bonds

Journal

CRYSTAL GROWTH & DESIGN
Volume 13, Issue 9, Pages 3935-3952

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/cg4006357

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. United States-Israel Binational Science Foundation (Jerusalem) [2004118]
  2. South African National Research Foundation for a postdoctoral scholarship [SFP2007070400002]
  3. Oppenheimer Memorial Trust
  4. Molecular Sciences Institute
  5. South African National Research Foundation
  6. Centre for High Performance Computing of South Africa
  7. Ferris State University
  8. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  9. Division Of Computer and Network Systems [2004118] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The recent literature has shown an increase in the number of co-crystals reported to be polymorphic, with at least 45 such systems identified thus far. The question of whether co-crystals, defined as any multicomponent neutral molecular complex that forms a crystalline solid, are inherently less prone to polymorphism than the individual components is shown to be untrue in four sets of polymorphic co-crystals. The co-crystal formers in this study, acridine, nicotinamide, 3-hydroxybenzoic acid, 2,4-dihydroxybenzoic acid, malonic acid, and pimelic acid, are all polymorphic in their unimolecular states and are shown to be dimorphic in the following combinations: (3-hydroxybenzoic acid).(acridine) [1(I) and 1(II)), (2,4-dihydroxybenzoic acid). (nicotinamide) [4(I) and 4(II)], (malonic acid).(nicotinamide) [5(I) and 5(II)], and (pimelic acid).(nicotinamide) [6(I) and 6(II)]. These co-crystals are assembled primarily using carboxylic acid and phenol hydrogen bond donors that hydrogen bond to pyridine N or amide carbonyl acceptors. Two different combinations of donors and acceptors are primarily responsible for the formation of polymorphs in 1 and 4, whereas conformational differences within the malonic and pimelic acid molecules lead to different packing arrangements using the same combination of hydrogen bonded interactions in 5 and 6. The 1:2 co-crystal of (3-hydroxybenzoic acid)center dot(acridine)2 (2) displays both the phenol O-H center dot center dot center dot N hydrogen bond observed in 1 (I) and the carboxylic acid O-H center dot center dot center dot N hydrogen bond observed in 1(11). In addition, a methanol solvate of (2,4-dihydroxybenzoic acid)center dot(nicotinamide) (3) is reported. DFT calculations show that the carboxylic acid center dot center dot center dot pyridine hydrogen bond is strongest and one of co-crystallization's most useful interactions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available